Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Friday, March 31, 2006

Off Topic Race, Class, and Making Sure Someone Pays

In case you missed it, the Duke Lacrosse team has been suspended for the season and the town of Durham thrown into a mess, following an alleged (notice I spelled that right) rape of a black exotic dancer by three white lacrosse players on March 13th.

What makes it more disturbing is the racial overtones presented by the alleged victim including statements to the fact that racial slurs were used as she was being raped and some talk amongst the media that the players specifically asked for an African-American dancer when they called the service.

From there the picture only gets more confusing. Protests against white privilege in a town more than 40% African American. A D.A. inciting such by talking openly to the media about how guilty the suspects are. Almost all members of the lacrosse team obtaining lawyers. The 46 white players on the lacrosse team (and there are only 47 total players) giving up DNA by court order, for some reason that isn't clear considering the three apparent assailants were identified by name by the victim.

There is even talk of reprisal by the community against Duke students.

There are many reasons to put off writing on this topic. Amongst them, the wait for the DNA results and the fact I have exams closing in. But here I am writing. I just read one too many articles on this situation and I couldn't stop going over in my head what was wrong with some people's response to this terrible crime and what was wrong with the media's coverage of it.

I love lacrosse, I've played through high school and college, and I love the south. I was as close as any school to attending Washington & Lee University which is a microcosm for many of criticisms lobbed at Duke since the beginning of this catastrophe - white southern affluence, racism, studgy conservatism and entitlement. It may suffer these even more actually. Because of this, these editorials, and even the "unbiased" fact pieces, seem to irk me.

Listen to the disdain in the words of Greg Garber (his editorial can be found in the link above):
Five signs taped together to the wrought-iron work on the front landing read, "Innocent Until Proven Guilty."

Another read, "ALLEDGED: Represented as existing or as being as described, but not so proved; supposed."

The source for the definition was listed as www.dictionary.com, and that online source presumably wasn't responsible for the first "D." Apparently at Duke, where the average SAT verbal scores fall between 690 and 770, not everyone has a command of spelling.
As if to say that these white affluent kids who come to this prestigious school, especially the jocks, aren't quite as good as they think they are. My god, Garber seems to be displaying the same self consciousness and contempt, when discussing those he views as elitists, as any Durham resident he quotes in his little masturbatory op/ed.
While recent studies show that females make up a decided majority at many colleges, 52 percent of Duke's students are male. According to statistics furnished by the Princeton Review, Duke's Caucasian population is 56 percent, compared to 11 percent for African Americans. Durham, by contrast, is a city of 200,000; and the 2000 Census placed the black population at 43.8 percent, narrowly behind the 45.5 percent that is white.
This is just inappropriate. I cannot sit here, no matter how many times I read the above paragraph, and convince myself Garber is merely illuminating the differences in composition between town and gown. This is a criticism. The truth, contrasting Duke's sex ratio and ethnic breakdown as if to show its lack of diversity compared with Durham is nothing but sensationalism.

Playing up the facts for the story, for effect, is no doubt something Mr. Garber shares with his hero Tom Wolfe. 11% African American is much closer to the national average, considering 85% of Duke undergraduates are from out of state, than the Durham average. It is a very reasonable rate considering the challenges faced by African American children who likely appear in underfunded schools, that do not prepare then in any way to enter college, at an extreme rate compared to whites.
Tom Wolfe saw all of this coming. Or a lot of it, anyway.
This is the beginning of the long, multi-paragraphed song of praise to Mr. Wolfe in the article.

Anyone who thinks I am Charlotte Simmons is an accurate representation of the southern "white" university and its fraternity life and its varsity sports really has no idea of the situation. I read it a while ago, and left with a much worse taste in my mouth than the New York Times. Even they, however, took the time to point out the flaws in Wolfe's attempt to recreate college life, calling his characters "cartoons" and pointing to...
...some unintentional comedy as Wolfe meticulously delineates a drinking game he has discovered called ''quarters,'' [and] attempts to imitate vulgar rap lyrics...
As the only book of the accomplished Mr. Wolfe that I read I'm sure as the Times say that I merely got unlucky as "it is by far the weakest of his novels."

Despite its unreliability, I am Charlotte Simmons seems to be Greg Garber only source for researching what the southern university is like before venturing out into his editorial.

If Garber didn't graduate from some liberal arts college tucked away in the northeast or the west coast during the 1980s then I don't know anyone who did. Okay, so I'm going out on a limb saying that but I think it is a strong possibility judging by what he's written here today.

Greg Garber drew my ire only for the date of publication and extensiveness of his own rant. It was the "last straw" that pushed me into putting my own thoughts on the situation and the drivel coming from the media down into print. That is what this blog is for, right?

In anycase, he certainly isn't the only writerto have presented judged the accused or cheered on the outrage of the citizens of Durham. I think it should be pointed out however, that it appears the more verbal displays have come not from the townies alone but from the lacrosse team's fellow students. Not all of them are so judgemental of course.

For those near burning effigies and memorizing the faces of the lacrosse team members from posters (lest they fall victim to their wiles themselves) I suppose we have the joys of liberalism in the higher education to thank. Yet setting this aside, here we have a crusade making 40 some odd men, not yet guilty, scapegoats for years of social and racial tensions and problems. How truly liberal are such judgments?

The most disgusting of all is the District Attorney inflaming the situation.
"If it's not the way it's been reported, then why are they so unwilling to tell us what, in their words, did take place that night?" [the District Attorney] told Smith on Thursday. "And one would wonder why one needs an attorney if one was not charged and had not done anything wrong."
Yes, I wonder why the hell I would get a lawyer when I'm a person of interest in an investigation that will lead to charges that carry a minimum of 16 to 20 years (quote above taken from this link).

He has said no matter how the DNA evidence comes back he's going to file charges against some lacrosse player. I could call out his lack of blood hound sense in this situation, as he's apparently already closed his mind around a very specific idea of what actually happened that night, but I won't because he may be right. His job is to make a case and if he thinks he can then he should.

The fact he already has enough evidence to apparently convince him what happened and make a case sans DNA does raise one of my eyebrows however. Where are the charges then? And why the hell did he even get DNA and from 46 players? It seems like he doesn't even know who to charge. And the strength of obtaining DNA seems to be if they had some example, already, from the victim's body, say a rape kit or under her nails. And if that DNA doesn't match up with any taken from the players...well then there's a problem, no matter what the D.A. says.

What I will chastise Durham's D.A. on is his inability to shut the hell up. His words are incitive and contradictory to his role as a public servant. There is no free speech issue here. If he doesn't want to shut up he shouldn't run for reelection (and it is coming up soon...what a coincidence). Then he can blab about any case he wants to as a private citizen.

All his talking may have the D.A. back posturing a bit. He now says that after the DNA evidence comes back it may take some time for charges to be filed. Nor is he sure that he'll make the DNA results public, which is a little peculiar considering how much he's been talking so far...the results would just be one more thing out of his mouth.

We do agree on one thing however, if this report is true:
The Herald-Sun also reported that some lacrosse players gave accounts of what transpired on the night of the alleged attack to university administrators. Nifong told the newspaper that he would ask the school to disclose those accounts voluntarily. If the university withholds the information, Nifong would seek a court order to obtain the testimonials.
If you don't want to talk to investigators then don't talk to anyone but your lawyer. That being said, I don't know my law very well, but how much are such statements worth unless they were made to campus police? What type of hearsay rules apply to these things?

Something terrible probably happened at that party on March 13. If it did someone should pay the price. But, probably is not certainly and innocent until proven guilty. This case should never be tried in Durham if it comes to that, not with the D.A. and the media basically calling for protests. Let who did this rot in prison but realize this is apparently only the last incident in a boiling tense situation between town and gown. A tense situation which may have as much to do with those who watch Duke from the outside as any part of the student body, who the media apparently want to demonize.

posted by TXMed at 8:55 PM 0 comments

Booty Back Surgery

When USC football and medicine come together.

Looks like John David Booty will lose some time in trying to impress the Coaches and fend off redshirt freshman Mark Sanchez for the starting QB spot next year. He'll be out two to three months after undergoing back surgery for a bulging disc. That is unfortunate, the guy was an incredibly talented high school player who could've gone anywhere, and he came to USC and has waited patiently 4 years for his chance to play and lead this team. I hope this doesn't cost him his chance to start next season.

posted by TXMed at 6:47 PM 0 comments

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Patch Adams

My school hired Patch Adams to come and speak today. It was packed. I admire what he does, but despite his own touting of his intellectual prowess I think his personal philosophy is kind've primitive and hypocritical.

He's a radical, a socialistic and a holist. While he may not use those labels himself I don't think he'd have a problem with them. He has a bit of an ego himself as well.

He doesn't believe in psychiatry. He refuses to recognize or treat even dementia/break disorders such as schizophrenia. Maybe he should hook up with Tom Cruise and they can discuss the curative properties of vitamins in these cases.

Being an idealist isn't a bad thing but I am a little bit troubled by how much Patch thought he understood the world. He was very proud of the thousands of applications he's gotten from physicians who want to come work at the hospital he's building in West Virginia for $300/month. He should be. But later during the Q & A session to cite that as proof that it is a feasible way healthcare can be fixed - all doctors working for free that is - may be noble, but certainly isn't accurate or reasonable.

He puts great weight in the whole body. I kind've do as well, but Patch has gone off the road a bit as we might imagine, ignoring science it seems in favor of other methods.

His distaste for money was rampant. His distaste for film and television was as well, along with sports (that was a big one). Wastes of time; all of them. He admitted he'd had to abandon his plan of never seeking money to fuel his agenda, after about twelve years of working out of a house with several other physicians (all the physicians and their families along with the patients lived there). So he started seeking fame and funds for his institute.

One of the ways he does this is by profiting from a form of entertainment he thinks lowers our community intelligence. He told us everyone should turn off their televisions forever even as the movie 'Patch Adams' is probably playing on some channel. That is money for a clown trip to Cambodia or to pay for a bone marrow transplant for some child.

He's done some wonderful work but anyone going into the 21st century ranting against capitalism (and he certainly did) is just so far out in left field that its difficult to take them seriously. But maybe that is part of his gig...he is a clown.

posted by TXMed at 9:00 PM 1 comments

Sago Mine Medical Miracle

It has been a while since I've updated this, but several months back I posted several times on what really is the amazing medical progress of Randy McCloy, the sole survivor of the Sago mine accident. Well, now, finally, he's going home.

posted by TXMed at 6:30 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Off Topic Arrested In A Bar

Absolute Ridiculousness (Is That A Word?)
Texas has begun sending undercover agents into bars to arrest drinkers for being drunk, a spokeswoman for the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission said on Wednesday.

"There are a lot of dangerous and stupid things people do when they're intoxicated, other than get behind the wheel of a car," Beck said. "People walk out into traffic and get run over, people jump off of balconies trying to reach a swimming pool and miss."
Seriously, at least present a more sound excuse for the sudden enforcement than what is provided above. If I MIGHT jump off MY balcony and miss MY swimming pool do we really want the government to step in to 'protect' me.

Before long if you're taking a prescription medicine or drinking anywhere you're not going to be able to leave your padded room.

God forbid I get drunk in the privacy of my own home, forget to turn off my stove and burn my house and maybe my neighbor's down. Some law enforcement agency better take some preemptive action...and soon.

posted by TXMed at 8:02 PM 1 comments

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Match to High Risk

US Graduates (compared to International Medical Students) filled 72% of OB/GYN residency spots this year in the match. OB/GYN, as a high risk specialty, has been considerably unpopular amongst medical students the past several years. The story is from the subscription required AMNews.
In the 2006 National Resident Matching Program held March 16, graduates of U.S. allopathic medical schools filled 72.4% of obstetrics and gynecology programs, or 835 of the 1,154 positions. It marked the first time that U.S. allopathic graduates matching in ob-gyn has climbed out of the 60% range in three years.
And here I was thinking in ten years all the children would be delivered by foreign graduates.

posted by TXMed at 8:34 PM 0 comments

Rights To Action

"Observe that all legitimate rights have one thing in common: they are rights to action, not to rewards from other people. The American rights impose no obligations on other people, merely the negative obligation to leave you alone. The system guarantees you the chance to work for what you want — not to be given it without effort by somebody else."

-- Dr. Leonard Peikoff, from a speech titled 'Healthcare Is Not A Right'

H/T MUSC Tiger

posted by TXMed at 11:03 AM 1 comments

Monday, March 27, 2006

Fat

Is obesity a national threat? Maybe where I am.

I have trouble getting into the national campaign to fight what really is, most of the time, a personal choice (you either want to put in the effort and maintain the self control to achieve and maintain a 'healthy' weight or you don't) but that lack of concern might partly be because I'm 160 lbs and 6' 1" and could eat 3500 calories a day and probably not put on a pound.

But really as individuals if we are truly concerned about health then we need to take prevention seriously, and a huge part of that is nutrition.
Being overweight increases the risk for diseases such as type 2 diabetes, heart diseases, stroke, sleep apnea, respiratory problems and some cancers. Being obese poses the greatest health risks.

A study released last year by the National Institutes of Health suggests average life expectancy could decline by nearly five years if the rising rates of obesity cannot be curbed.

posted by TXMed at 5:28 PM 0 comments

Saturday, March 25, 2006

Off Topic From London



posted by TXMed at 9:30 AM 0 comments

Friday, March 24, 2006

How We Get Paid

There is a great post (which cites some other blogs) up at Medrants on the reimbursement crisis. This is relevant because I'm trying to put together a 'How We Get Paid' lecture series, focusing on the economics of physician practice and the politics influencing reimbursement, for next year at our school. It might be once a month during lunch and targeted towards the basic science years students.

posted by TXMed at 1:12 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

URTI v. LRTI

Some explanation for why H5N1 isn't spread easily for humans...for now.
The Japanese-American team found that, as expected, H5N1 avian flu is drawn to the 2,3 receptors. Luckily for humans, they also found that 2,3 is most abundant on cells within the alveoli, the most remote, microscopic branches of the lungs' "respiratory tree."

H5N1 was much less likely to bind to cells in the upper respiratory tract.

In contrast, common human flu strains prefer to bind with the 2,6 receptor, which is found in plentiful numbers on upper respiratory tract cells. That makes sense, experts say, because every time humans cough or sneeze, droplets from this area are easily expelled into the air, making human-to-human transmission of ordinary seasonal flu possible.

H5N1 colonizes a much deeper, tough-to-access region of the lung -- making infection more difficult to spread and treat in humans, the researchers said.

posted by TXMed at 2:15 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Uninsured By "Choice"

I found this link on this weeks Grand Rounds (@ Healthyconcerns.com). The question is how many people are uninsured by choice, as presented by InsureBlog, which I may start reading more often. Estimates and figures on those who lack health insurance and truly cannot afford it are extremely controversial and subjective.

Take the poverty line for example, an oft quoted figure in any debate concerning government welfare. It likely grossly overestimates true "poverty".

While as the story points out what is a necessity varies over time, it is only fringe arguments that will recognize a television (which 91% of those in the poorest 10% own) or a stereo (42%) as a necessity in my lifetime. Many of the same truths concerning "poverty" naturally concern the debate over the uninsured as well.

For example, as with the poverty figures a closer look at the uninsured shows that many are transients, briefly passing through as uninsured over a matter of a few months, which I will admit is still significant if not as emergent as some of those for a right to health coverage would have us believe. As I've commented on before, this along with other errors (some of which the Bureau has admitted and corrected) make the most cited figure of 40+ million highly dubious.

But this is a post over different numbers. Cases certainly vary and specifics need to be known, but as InsureBlog points out imagining a scenario where an average family brining in ~50,000 dollars, even with several children, could not find and afford minimal health insurance, and thus dissipate at least a good chunk of their healthcare costs, with at least a little effort is unlikely.

I don't know what it would be like to be poor and the correct assault on my piece here is certainly that it is easy from my position (in front of my expensive computer and high definition television) to claim that certain items are "luxuries" and that the vast majority of the uninsured are choosing such items over insurance. But, really, when you step back from the shock of the medical bills, from the upset families on 60 minutes, that is what it looks like.

This is one of the greediest, consumption driven civilizations in the history of the world and it extends from top to bottom. The drive for luxury goods, not just William - Sonoma as in the story but non-necessities, certainly extends down into the lower classes. Does the fact that everyone else has a television, has a dishwasher, has two cars mean that this large group of the uninsured deserves (I use this word very intentionally) them as well?

I find that hard to buy, and I'm sure most do as well, as it reeks of notions of economic equality.

The numbers will always be debatable, and I'm sure plenty can be cited against me, as it is simply too subjective to try to define what is "enough", yet, often times I feel that proponents of universal health coverage approach the problem with their heart on their sleeve and ignore the real possibility that the large majority of the uninsured in this country might be choosing their condition in exchange for immediate quality of life improvements.

Of note, the conservatives who make the arguments like I have above, well, they were the whiny insecure kids. Meanwhile the self-reliant, confident kids grew up to become smart, free thinking liberals who fight for the rights of the poorest Americans. Of course, the study was done in Berkeley (boy, I hate Cal...but that is a PAC 10 thing).

Even if the figures fall in my favor, and I'm not claiming the book is closed as this post is merely part of a debate, the question may be: so what? So the number is 7 million (I pulled that out of thin air) that truly cannot afford health insurance instead of 30 or 40 million, but the situation may be, as some people view it, that even 1 person without the healthcare, and insurance to pay for it, that they need is unacceptable. I can respect that argument even as I don't agree with it.

H/T Slate

posted by TXMed at 8:29 PM 1 comments

Standardized Patients Around The Town

So flipping through Google I've learned that in the early 90s less than two thirds of medical schools used SPs and nowadays its probably approaching 85 - 90%. I've also found several interesting links although I expected to find more in the media.

Here's a University of Michigan student newspaper bit piece:
"You have to be able to give them the story line and improvise," she says. "You go into that room, and you really become that person. It feels like you're in a doctor's office, and you really feel that nervousness."
The problems and benefits of standardized patients being the main judges of student performance during OSCEs. This is the case with my situation.
These results suggest that SP examiners are acceptable to medical students, SP rate students higher than physicians and, unlike physician scores, SP scores are not related to other measures of competence.
The Association for Standardized Patient Educators.

posted by TXMed at 4:56 PM 0 comments

Off The Ventilator

A young child's physicians in Britain recently lost a court case against his parents in which they wanted to take him off his ventilator and allow him to die. The catch:
The case was believed to be the first in which doctors had asked to allow a patient who is not in a persistent vegative state to die.

posted by TXMed at 4:49 PM 0 comments

Standardized Patients

So, in my first year clinical skills course, like so many other medical schools I get to work with standardized patients. First off, I'm scared we may not be getting the cream of the crop. I wouldn't be surprised if I opened an exam room door to find this guy, as he is.

I'm not sure if it's my school of just the standardized patient pool in general. Don't get me wrong, there are some great standardized patients...but there are some wierd ones. And of course, even from my own experience you can take "standardized" straight out of the previous sentence and it holds just as true but this is a rant on trying to turn retirees and the likes into quality actors.

Second, I'm trying to rationalize my experiences with the SPs with what I've seen from my work in medicine and my shadowing experiences.

I don't want to diminish the great opportunities standardized patients bring to us medical students but let me relate this story. I had my first clinical skills test the other day. There were five exam rooms, in our beautiful new clinical skills center, I had to stop at.

There was a "chart" on the outside of each door, and it had the chief complaint and some basic history and then it instructed you to perform some aspect of the physical exam and/or history. For example, "Do A Lung/Chest Exam."

I get to my first door and am instructed simply to "Take A Sexual History". I don't think the patient was quite grasping the point of the exercise, as here is how it went down:

I knock, enter, and introduce myself. As I'm washing my hands I start questioning.

Q. So, Mr. X, what brings you in today?

There is a pause.

A. Uh, I don't know. Just a check up for my insurance.

I take a seat, and am taken back a bit. Is this a test about getting information form a reluctant patient? I look up at the camera filming me, a little annoyed.

Q. So, nothing seems to be wrong? You don't have any concerns about your health?
A. No. (Standardized Patient comes out of character) Did you even read the scenario outside? I think you're suppose to be doing some kind of sexual history or something.

I sit there dumbfounded. I guess I'm going to have to hit the situation right on the head.

Q. Uh, okay. So, Mr. X, how is your sex life?
A. I'm concerned about getting old. Sometimes I can't get an erection.

Finally, there we go.

It would've been more appropriate no doubt for me simply to sit down and say I had been sent in to ask some questions about the man's sexual history and if he would mind but really, the patient should've been able to adapt to the situation.

There's some loose wiring here between an insurance physical and coming in complaining of ED. It clearly wasn't intentional, like the standardized patient was instructed to pretend he was coming in for an insurance physical and I'm suppose to find that he's also concerned but embarrassed about ED.

Of course this is a guy whose write up of the encounter will also play a major role in my grade.

It is difficult to see what these standardized patient exams have to do with medicine. Except I awkwardly bumble through these actors, trying to impress a grade out of them (it was ugly on my part let me tell you), way worse than I do around real patients.

I'm not the med student who was an EMT or a nurse before but still, I've worked in ortho-spine office and an optho practice. In fact if we forget about the summer working the funnel cake hut at a Six Flags (and I desperately try to block that from my memory), then medical office work is the only real job I've ever had. Granted my experience in the real world is limited to weighing patients, asking what medications they're on. Even so, something doesn't feel right about these standardized patients.

I guess close counts more than just in horse shoes and handgrenades and these clinical skill exams being more of a place to practice physical exam skills than actual accurate medical scenarios, that they play their role in my education.

After the test I realized there is something pleasant about being down in the ER. Even beyond the trauma cases, the homeless guy with the abscess or the IV drug user whose needle snapped off in his arm, they know why they came to the ER and the doctors know why they're there. Okay, not all the time. And most patients don't come into the doctors office without knowing why they're there. However, there's an urgency to the emergency department that makes the relationship between the doctor and patient more on the nose.

The attraction to that may say something about my person-to-person skills.

There's usually a definitive problem, there may be a lot of detective work to do on its causes, but none of this fumbling around the issue like the other day, with standardized patients whose Oscar dreams exploded on the launch pad.

I guess it is a rite of passage and as much as I criticize it, the ability to practice the doctor-patient relationship and physical exam skills is a valuable one. Indeed I'm sure in my time I will meet innumerable patients more awkward, frustrating or bizarre than any standardized patient I will ever see. How very few are my experiences.

posted by TXMed at 12:29 PM 1 comments

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Wonderdrug

Statins have been on a number of healthcare blogs I read of late. First on Medical Rants a link to a report on statins preventing implanted defib use in patients who used them regularly.

Now the Los Angeles times references a study where high dose statin use actually unclogged arteries. So long stents and open heart surgery?

In The Pipeline's "The Big Statin Pillowfight" comments on the flurry of cholesterol studies and why they're being funded.

posted by TXMed at 8:47 AM 0 comments

Market Forces And Antibiotics

My microbiology class is kind've scary. The lecturers speak of the end of the era of antibiotics and we learn about MRSA (also here) and how by the time I'm out practicing every staph aureus infection will be VRSA.

From an AMA News article (subscription required) comes a piece on the need for new antibiotics, and a compelling argument against my views on the marketplace and medicine.
"In the past, it appeared we were keeping up with the emergence of resistance because the pharmaceutical industry was keeping up," said IDSA President Martin J. Blaser, MD, professor of internal medicine at New York University Medical Center. "But now, the discovery pipeline is drying up, and few new antibiotics are being developed," he said at the briefing.

Market forces are not likely to help, said George H. Talbot, MD, lead author of an article on the issue in the March 1 Clinical Infectious Diseases, also at the briefing. "It's much more profitable for a pharmaceutical company to make a cholesterol drug that you take for a lifetime than an antibiotic you take for a week."

posted by TXMed at 8:10 AM 0 comments

Computer "Virus"

An atom-for-atom recreation of a virus at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications. The entire program is a brief simulation of a moment of "life" for the Tobacco Mosaic Virus.

From Nature's website:
The model also shows that the virus coat collapses without its genetic material. This suggests that, when reproducing, the virus builds its coat around the genetic material rather than inserting the genetic material into a complete coat. "We saw something that is truly revolutionary," Schulten says.
This is interesting considering what I was just taught in the virology section of my Microbiology class.

posted by TXMed at 7:59 AM 0 comments

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

No Thank You For The Donation

The number of cadavers who had tissue illegally removed and sold for implantation in the Biomedical Tissue services scandal may be significantly higher than originally thought by the media.
While the exact number of pieces distributed and used in operations has not been revealed, hospitals in recent weeks have spoken of contacting hundreds of patients who may have received tainted tissue.

BTS has been accused of collecting body parts without donor consent and selling them for use in transplants performed at hospitals and other medical facilities across the country. The owner of BTS and three others were charged in a scheme that earned them millions of dollars. All four have pleaded not guilty.

BTS supplied bone, skin and tendons to various processors, who in turn provided them to distributors. Those companies are not accused of any wrongdoing.

Minnesota-based distributor Medtronic Inc. reported that at least 8,000 pieces that came from BTS were implanted, and others are being recalled, according to documents filed January in a federal lawsuit in Ohio.

posted by TXMed at 8:18 PM 0 comments

Foriegn Physicians

Kevin, MD has a controversial letter to the editor.
I have no objection to the racial background of these physicians. I do question their motivation - surely doctors are needed in their native country where many of them were fortunate enough to receive their medical training. Physicians are almost worshiped by many in India, so while prestige there might be greater, the financial return here must be overwhelmingly larger.

posted by TXMed at 1:20 PM 0 comments

Decision Tree

posted by TXMed at 12:10 AM 0 comments

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Interventional Radiology

As noted in a recent post apparently my destiny is to be a radiologist. In an odd twist just days after taking those tests which suggested radiology, I got my first piece of recruitment mail as a medical student and what should this piece of recruitment be hyping except interventional radiology.

The Society of Interventional Radiology sent me a computer CD with information geared towards medical students on choosing interventional radiology as a career. Maybe they just want me to become a dues paying student member.

posted by TXMed at 5:06 PM 0 comments

Off Topic NFL QB Humility

Vince Young is too arrogant to be a successful NFL QB.
Young's success in the NFL will hinge almost exclusively on his willingness to prepare. And that's exactly what Young's Wonderlic score and other curious decisions call into question -- his will to prepare and his level of humility.

The fact that Young had to take the Wonderlic twice in order to score a 16 is an indication to me that Young did not prepare for the test, particularly the first time. That speaks to Young's arrogance. So does his choice in representation and his decision to visit the president and the White House sans sports coat and tie.

posted by TXMed at 5:04 PM 0 comments

Off Topic Poker Chips

So, I'm a big poker fan, I'm a big fidgeter, and I have these casino chips from the Bellagio and Tropicana (Las Vegas) which when I'm at home I almost HAVE to be shuffling.

Long story short I'm shuffling them while I'm studying Biochem and some of them fell down a crack into my couch and I can't find them down there. It is driving me crazy, and I really want them back cause I think it helps me focus and not get distracted, but I can't spend forever looking for them because I have a test tomorrow at 9.

If I get them out I should really work on weaning myself off these chips.

posted by TXMed at 4:52 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Medical Specialties

I'm a first year for goodness sake. Still this is kind've fun. I took two online quizzes on what medical specialty I may be most inclined to. I was kind've distressed by the top choice on the first one.

Pathway Evaluation Program
1. Pathology (Yikes!)
2. Diagnostic Radiology
3. Interventional Radiology (Pretty Cool)
4. ENT
5. Radiation Oncology
6. Plastic Surgery
7. Anesthesiology
8. Dermatology
9. Ophthalmology (Actually, Really Interested In This)
10. Colon & Rectal Surgery (Okay, Pretty Cool)

Medical Specialty Aptitude Test
1. Gastroenterology (#11 on Pathway Evaluation Program)
2. Radiology (Apparently This Is My Destiny)
3. Pulmonary/Critical Care
4. Infectious Diseases
5. Dermatology
6. Allergy & Immunology
7. Ob/Gyn (Yikes!)
8. Neurosurgery
9. Orthopedic Surgery (Pretty Cool)
10. Plastic Surgery

My destiny is radiology apparently. Other specialties that appear on both lists are Plastics and Dermatology. First off, it'll be a cold day in hell if I ever matched dermatology and I have no interest in it. Hand surgery, which you can do either as a plastic surgeon or an orthopedic surgeon is actually really cool.

The two specialties which appeared on the list and really have zero appeal and I doubt ever will are Pathology and Ob/Gyn. To the two program's credit they both put Psychiatry and Family Practice as the specialties I was least compatible with. Both of those make my short list of specialties I have no interest in.

Thoracic surgery, which if you asked me today is what I'd say I wanted to do appears as #17 and #15 respectively on the lists.

posted by TXMed at 8:58 AM 0 comments

Monday, March 06, 2006

Off Topic The Death of the Blockbuster

From my fellow USC School of Cinema-Television alum:
"The market forces that exist today make it unrealistic to spend $200 million on a movie," said Lucas, a near-billionaire from his feverishly franchised outer-space epics. "Those movies can't make their money back anymore. Look at what happened with 'King Kong.'"

"In the future, almost everything that gets shown in theaters will be indie movies," Lucas declared. "I predict that by 2025 the average movie will cost only $15 million."
Very true. Although making predictions about 2025 is a dangerous game. It wouldn't surprise me if the quickly evolving world of content delivery has destroyed movie theatres as we know them by this time. That may not be such a bad thing.

Despite all the doom and gloom, I am optimistic for the future of moviemaking.

posted by TXMed at 9:58 AM 0 comments

Friday, March 03, 2006

Walmart to Sell Plan B

Walmart was forced to start stocking Plan B at pharmacies in Massachuttes recently and now has decided to start selling it everywhere.

"We expected more states to require us to sell emergency contraceptives in the months ahead," said Ron Chumiuk, vice president of Pharmacy for Wal-Mart, in a statement.

"Because of this, and the fact that this is an FDA-approved product, we feel it is difficult to justify being the country's only major pharmacy chain not selling it."
I'm not a very virulent anti-abortion believer. It doesn't get me up in arms that pharmacies carry Plan B.

What does seem wrong like I said it before and will here again, this isn't a matter of emergent public health. This isn't an ER turning away a car wreck victim. Wal-Mart can't effectively serve community health by operating a pharmacy that doesn't stock Plan B? Hmmm...

posted by TXMed at 5:01 PM 0 comments

Chugging Along

Histology is done with! Next week, after a round of tests which includes national shelf exams in anatomy and biochemistry (ouch), these classes will come to a close as well. Their end will make room for the start of a particularly difficult course, at least as my school's curriculum is broken down, neuroscience/anatomy. Well, "difficult," is the word from the second years. Maybe I'll be a kind of idiot savant of neuroscience and breeze through it...or maybe I should start panicking.

posted by TXMed at 3:12 PM 0 comments

Goodbye and Thank You

I finished my last anatomy dissection yesterday. Exceedingly anti-climactic when I think back to how built up my first visit to the anatomy lab was.

It is kind've unsettling. We became almost too familiar with the gentleman who had donated himself to our learning. As we dissected the body became less and less human, and the fact that we were learning through the study of an actual once living person became more and more common.

I suppose this is the situation for almost every anatomy and medical school student who use dissections. It would be impractical for every lab, every day to be too much of a marvel. Still, when we lowered our body for the last time without any bit of recognition or anything more than a laughing "goodbye," it showed just how far we had come and maybe not in a good way.

Don't get me wrong, as I've previously posted on, our school made sure we understood the magnitude of the gift we were receiving. Our candlelight vigil for those who had donated themselves, about halfway through the anatomy course, was touching and sincere.

posted by TXMed at 2:42 PM 2 comments

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Do It Yourself

From Over My Med Body! a link to a blogger laying out her idea of a how to do it yourself abortion plan for South Dakota women.

posted by TXMed at 8:29 PM 3 comments

The 6 Scariest Bugs

Since I'm in Microbiology right now, I present Forbes' piece on the six scariest bacteria/fungi. Especially MSRA and VRE which are a major focus of my bacteriology section right now, these things are freaky...and the scariest part, what makes them scary (their resistance to time tested medical methods) is spreading to other bugs.

posted by TXMed at 8:24 PM 0 comments

Wrongful Birth

"If only I had known my baby was going to have Down's Syndrome, I never would've allowed him to be born"
The Ohio Senate yesterday voted 23-9 to prohibit lawsuits against doctors who negligently fail to inform a pregnant patient that her unborn child may have profound defects, preventing her from considering an abortion.

One Democrat joined the Republican majority in support of the bill, which Republicans characterized as closing the door in advance to a form of litigation Ohio courts have yet to recognize. Democrats countered that the measure is an assault on a woman's right to choose.
Every parent, well not every, but many parents, including myself, would want to know. What a ridiculously tough situation to be placed in, knowing before the birth that your child would have a severe congenital disability. However, should doctors not counseling testing be held responsible if the child does have deficits?

Probably not. But there are very legitimate purposes for having your child tested, like I said, despite my anti-abortion views I would want to know. Caring for such children takes considerable planning, setting up support systems, dealing with the emotional stress of the news all of which can be aided by the extra time.

H/T Kevin, MD

posted by TXMed at 7:01 PM 0 comments

Grand Rounds

I never update on where Grand Rounds will be. That might have something do with my lack of audience. What am I going to remind myself where Grand Rounds is?

I will say, I do make it a practice to browse it myself most weeks. Next week it is at,

Emergiblog

The titling of the painting at the top of the post is hilarious. Go visit, you'll see what I mean.

posted by TXMed at 6:03 PM 3 comments

  • Main Page

About The Blog

    Thoughts on becoming a doctor, healthcare policy, politics, as well as more random opines from a medical student still on the naive side of the fence.

Feeds




    Subscribe in FeedLounge
    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe by Email


Quote of the Moment

    "If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment."

    -- Marcus Aurelius

    Quote Archive

Countdown To USC Football


    2006/07 USC Football

    @ Arkansas
    Nebraska
    @ Arizona
    @ Washington St.
    Washington
    Arizona St.
    @ Oregon St.
    @ Stanford
    Oregon (Homecoming)
    Cal
    Notre Dame
    @ UCLA

Posts & Links Of Note

  • Universal Healthcare (Part 1)
  • Universal Healthcare (Part 2)
  • Give a Mouse a Cookie...
  • Need A Good Doctor?
  • Good Bye & Thank You
  • Healthcare Is Not A Right
  • Just How Poor Is Healthcare in America?
  • The Determinants of the Cost of Medical Liability Insurance
  • Basic Science In Medical School

First Year

    Medical Ethics
    Physiology
    Histology
    Gross Anatomy
    Biochemistry
    Microbiology
    Human Behavior
    Clinical Skills (CAP)
    Neuroscience

    Second Year

    Clinical Sciences I
    Clinical Sciences II
    Pathology
    Pharmacology
    Clinical Evaluation (ACES)
    Phsychopathology

Previous Posts

  • NEW HOME!
  • Hit The Breaks, Online Poker
  • A Sign of the Times...
  • TGN1412
  • More on Doping
  • Still Here, But No One Is Talking
  • B Sample Is Positive
  • Attempts At Photography In Europe 2
  • Responsibility In HIV
  • Attempts At Photography In Europe

Archives

  • May 2003
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006

Health & Science Blogs

  • Kevin, MD
  • Medical Rants
  • A Chance To Cut
  • Dr. Charles
  • Over My Med Body
  • Health Care Renewal
  • MedPundit
  • Dr. Sanity
  • MUSC Tiger
  • Push Fluids
  • SoloDoc
  • Surgical Diversion
  • PsychNotes
  • Red State Moron
  • In The Pipeline
  • Doctor
  • Brain Waves
  • All Blogged Up
  • Kidney Notes
  • Family Medicine Notes
  • The Healthcare Blog
  • intueri
  • Notes From Dr. RW
  • Political Blogs

  • Powerline
  • Cao's Blog
  • Commonsense & Wonder
  • Captain's Quarters
  • Museum of Left Wing Lunacy
  • Ace of Spades HQ
  • Anticipatory Retaliation
  • Clarity & Resolve
  • Conservative Dialysis
  • Cynical Nation
  • Instapundit
  • Vodkapundit
  • Swanky Conservative
  • Protein Wisdom
  • Right Wing Sparkle
  • OverLawyered
  • Point of Law
  • Cardinal Martini
  • Passionate Conservative
  • A Stitch In Haste
  • Crime & Federalism
  • Humor Blogs

  • The Dilbert Blog
  • Anonymous Lawyer
  • Horace Finkle
  • College Football Blogs

  • Inside USC
  • USC Football News
  • TrojanWire
  • Crazy Trojan Musings
  • Student Body Right
  • Boi From Troy
  • According to USC Trojan
  • Fan Blogs
  • Burnt Orange Nation
  • Heisman Pundit
  • Everyday Should Be Saturday
  • Blue Gray Sky
  • Bevo Sports
  • Screenwriting Blogs

  • Complications Ensue
  • I Find Your Lack of Faith Disturbing
  • Screenwriting Life
  • B Movie Writers
  • Man Bytes Hollywood
  • Wordplay
  • Poker Blogs

  • A Fool & His Money
  • Up For Poker
  • Dead Money
  • Sound of a Suckout
  • The Surly poker Gnome
  • Poker Prof

Healthcare Policy Links

  • AMSA
  • AMA
  • TMA
  • Medical News Links

  • Medscape
  • AMNews
  • QuackWatch
  • NewsRX
  • News Medical
  • Google Health
  • NEJM
  • JAMA
  • Health News Review
  • Med School Application Links

  • AAMC
  • AMCAS
  • TMDSAS
  • Student Doctor Network
  • Imagining & Anatomy Links

  • Learning Radiology
  • Cardiothoracic Imagining
  • Cardiac MRI
  • Neuroradiology Tutor
  • Medcyclopedia
  • Multi-Dimensional Embryo
  • Neuroanatomy
  • Whole Brain Atlas
  • Embryology Animations
  • WUSM Neuroanatomy
  • Neuroanatomy Atlas
  • Iowa Online Histology Atlas
  • Loyola Histology
  • Physiology Links

  • EKG Library
  • Heart Sounds
  • Vermont Online EKG Course
  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Respiratory Physiology
  • OSU Heart Antimations
  • Biochemistry Links

  • Indiana State Biochemistry
  • NetBiochem
  • Physical Exam Links

  • Screening Physical Exam
  • Neuroexam
  • Screening Physical Exam
  • Pharmacology Links

  • RX List
  • WHO Essential Medicines
  • Microbiology Links

  • Atlas of Parasitology
  • Vermont Molecular Genetics
  • UTMB Microbiology
  • Pathology Links

  • WebPath
  • Atlas of Pathology
  • Hematology Atlas
  • Medical Humanity Links

  • National Library of Medicine
  • History of Surgery
  • Residency Match Info Links

  • FRIEDA
  • ERAS
  • ERAS Application Statistics
  • NRMP
  • NRMP Match Statistics
  • San Francisco Match
  • Scutwork
  • Neurosurgery Match Statistics
  • Ophthalmology Match Statistics
  • You Want To Be A Surgeon?
  • Physician Hourly Income Survey
  • Pathway Evaluation Program
  • Medical Specialty Aptitude Test
  • Specialty Links

  • Textbook of Otolarynology
  • Surgical Tutor
  • Reference of Opthalmology
  • Textbook of Dermatology
  • Critical Care Tutorials
  • CardiologySite
  • Textbook of Orthopaedics
  • Pediatric Tutorials
  • Global Textbook Of Anesthesiology
  • Atlas of Dermatology
  • Merck Manual of Geriatrics
  • First Principles of Gastroenterology
  • Merck Manual
  • DSM IV
  • Surgical Knot Tying Guide

Blogging

    Powered by Blogger



Technorati

Worthy Causes

    EFF v. AT&T




Contact me at NOT AVAILABLE